I’ve heard this:
“Abraham tithed before the Law. That means tithing isn’t just part of the Law—it’s a universal requirement from God.”
At first glance, that sounds convincing.
But is that actually what Scripture is teaching?
Let’s slow down and examine what really happened—and what we often assume.
What Actually Happened in Genesis 14?
In Genesis 14:
- Abraham rescues Lot
- Wins a battle
- Meets Melchizedek
- Gives him a tenth of the spoils
Let’s highlight what’s not there:
- ❌ No command from God to tithe
- ❌ No instruction to repeat it
- ❌ No system established
- ❌ No mention of income—only war spoils
This is not a law. This is a unique moment.
So Why Did Abraham Give a Tenth?
It was “culture”. Yep.
In that culture, giving a tenth was a known way of saying:
“You are greater than me”
“This victory belongs to God”
It was:
- Voluntary
- Symbolic
Not a universal command.
The Big Logical Leap We Often Make
Here’s the argument:
Abraham did it → Therefore it must be required for all believers.
But this logic breaks down quickly.
Because Abraham did many things before the Law.
What Else Happened Before the Law?
If “before the Law” automatically means “binding forever,” then we have to be consistent.
Abraham also:
- Built altars and offered animal sacrifices
- Practiced circumcision (commanded in Genesis 17)
- Married in a patriarchal system with complex family structures
- Operated within covenant signs specific to his calling
So the question becomes: Why do we pick tithing… but not everything else?
Selective Theology Is the Real Issue
We often:
- Choose what fits our tradition
- Ignore what doesn’t
But Scripture doesn’t work that way.
You can’t say:
✅ “Abraham tithed before the Law, so we must tithe”
and at the same time say:
❌ “Circumcision was before the Law, but we don’t follow that”
Unless you have a clear New Covenant reason for the difference.
What Does the New Testament Actually Emphasize?
When the New Testament speaks about giving:
It never commands a fixed percentage.
Instead, it says:
“Each one must give as he has decided in his heart…”— 2 Corinthians 9:7
That’s a completely different framework:
- Not obligation
- But what you are willing, how much ever.
Why Does Hebrews Talk About Abraham’s Tithe Then?
In Hebrews 7, the focus is not giving.
It’s about priesthood.
The argument is:
- Abraham gave a tithe to Melchizedek
- Therefore Melchizedek is greater
- Therefore Jesus’ priesthood is greater
That’s it.
- It’s not a teaching on financial practice
- It’s a teaching about who Jesus is
The Deeper Issue: Law vs Fulfillment
This connects to something even bigger.
Before Christ:
- People related to God through systems and structures
After Christ:
- Everything is fulfilled in Jesus Christ
Conclusion
Yes, Abraham tithed before the Law.
But:
- It was not commanded
- It was not repeated
- It was not presented as a universal standard
And most importantly: The New Testament never turns it into one

Leave a Reply